Media propaganda plays a significant role in shaping public perception and influencing movements. Recently, a group of protesters in Nigeria was seen raising the Russian flag, sparking discussions about their motivations and connections to Russia. Notably, these protesters have no direct contact with Russia or any individuals associated with them. Instead, their actions stem from a broader narrative propagated by the media, which portrays Russia as a potential savior against Western imperialism.
The media has a powerful influence on how nations and their actions are perceived. For instance, American military capabilities are often highlighted in films and news reports, creating a specific image of the U.S. as a dominant force. Conversely, countries like Russia and China are frequently portrayed as adversaries, selling the perception of them as evil entities opposing the West or civility. This contradiction is a product of media narratives and propaganda, which students of international communication or those familiar with the field understand well.
When the protests in Nigeria began a few days ago, the demands of the protesters were centered on the hardships in the country. Surprisingly however, some elements in the northern part of the country seem to be demanding something more radical and a complete shift in ideology.
I watched a video of protesters burning the Nigerian flag while raising Russian flags, and I couldn’t help but question whether they truly grasp the seriousness of such an act. There is a crucial distinction between opposing a government and undermining the sovereignty of your country. If this isn’t clear to you, a thorough civic education is urgently needed. With all due respect, how are you any different from the insurgents wreaking havoc in our nation?
It’s incredibly naive to think that a group of young people and children would spontaneously decide to have Russian flags made to show solidarity with the East. Russia is not even the primary counterforce to the West in Africa—China is. Russia’s current prominence is mainly due to its alleged involvement in power disruptions in neighboring countries, which should alarm anyone.
Even at the height of the Cold War, you wouldn’t see kids who couldn’t recite the USSR’s name romanticizing the Eastern bloc as we have seen recently. Especially considering that Russia has not been noted for any significant generosity towards Nigeria. It would make more sense if China, which has been our “benevolent” development partner, were the one being so idolized and invited to meddle in Nigeria’s internal matters.
Anyone with even a basic understanding of foreign policy would recognize that this situation goes beyond our internal crises as a nation. In a region plagued by political instability and prolonged insurgency, we must take a moment to reflect on where to draw the line. A hungry person wouldn’t spend money on fabric to make another country’s flag—they’d use it to buy food. We should be advocating for a favorable economic climate that benefits everyone, including public officials, without becoming unwitting pawns in an agenda we don’t comprehend.
You have the constitutional right to fiercely oppose your government. However, challenging the sovereignty of your country is a different matter entirely. This is a line you must not cross. Consulting a constitutional lawyer might help you understand this better. I hope you recognize this boundary before it’s too late.
Gharny Yeku Wrote from Abeokuta, the Ogun State Capital. He can be reached via: ganny1911@gmail.com
Business Metrics Nigeria commits to publishing a diversity of insights, views, opinions and comments. It, therefore, welcomes your reaction to this and any of our articles via email: editor@businessmetricsng.com